Why is user testing considered a valuable method in assessing technical documents?

User testing is considered a valuable method in assessing technical documents primarily because it reveals user interaction patterns. This method involves real users engaging with the document, which helps identify how they navigate, understand, and apply the information presented. Observing actual users allows for insights into their behaviors, challenges, and preferences when interacting with the material, leading to a better alignment of the document with user needs.

When users encounter difficulties or confusion, their reactions provide critical feedback that can highlight areas for improvement, ensuring that the document is intuitive and accessible. This direct feedback loop can make the final product more effective in achieving its intended purpose and better satisfying user expectations.

Other options, while they might have value in certain contexts, do not directly relate to the unique insights gained from observing user interactions. Presenting to stakeholders, consolidating team opinions, or eliminating peer review may enhance presentation aspects or internal approval processes, but they do not focus on the user's actual experience with the document itself. Understanding user interaction patterns is key to creating effective technical documentation that performs well in real-world applications.